Lord of the Flies William Golding and Jean Jacques Rousseau

William Golding and Jean Jacques Rousseau had very different points of view on society. Golding thought what all humans are born evil and that is what makes society horrible. Rousseau things the complete difference he thinks that all humans are born pure, nice, and innocent and that society is what corrupts humans. I agree with Rousseau because I don’t believe that all humans are born evil. This topic about these different views on society is what the book Lord of the Flies is about. The book written by Golding shows a bit of Rousseau’s view and a lot of his view on society. Jean Jacques Rousseau was a French philosopher in 1712-1778. He believed that all humans are born innocent and what corrupt them and makes evil is society. He believes that if there was no society it would not make human beings feel so judged, shy or depended on others. Without society people would feel more equal they would not want to compare themselves Humans would feel freer. Rousseau thought th at society weakens humans that if someone were to grow up in a natural place and place far from society they would be stronger. Compared o the people that grow up in a society they weaken. William Golding had different thoughts; he believes that all humans are born evil and corrupt society. He believes that he evil man will all ways try to fight for power and by doing that in corrupts society. He thinks that because they have social natures and they use that to start fight or argument, and by arguingShow MoreRelatedDiffering Views from William Golding and Jean-Jacques Rousseau in Lord of the Flies536 Words   |  2 PagesWilliam Golding and Jean-Jacques Rousseau had different views on humanity/society. Although they didn’t live in the same time period, their views have been compared to one another. William Golding’s views on humanity which were reflected in the book, â€Å"Lord of the Flies†, stated that all humans are naturally selfish, rude and greedy. Rousseau believed that all humans are naturally good and it was society that corrupted them. I agree more with Rousseau’s argument about human beings being naturallyRead MoreDifferent Beliefs from William Golding and Jean-Jacques Rousseau in Lord of the Flies587 Words   |  2 PagesWilliam Golding and Jean-Jacques Rousseau both have very different beliefs about a ma n’s naturalistic ability towards others including the society. Rousseau’s view is that a male being is pure, but later ruined by society and its entire entity. Golding’s belief is that a male always has an evil source and/or opening within them and the problem continues to get worse as time evolves. Golding also believes that without a strict series of rules a male being is mentally and naturalistically unstableRead MoreDifferent Views from William Golding and Jean-Jacques Rousseau in Lord of the Flies806 Words   |  3 PagesWilliam Golding, author of The Lord of the Flies, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau had very different views on human nature and civilization’s effect of humanity. While Golding believed that humans were inherently evil and that society and its rules were what kept humans in line and good, as reflected in The Lord of the Flies, Rousseau believed the opposite. He believed that humans were inherently good and that it was society and civilizat ions that corrupted man. For the most part, I agree with Golding’sRead MoreLord of the Flies by William Golding and the Philosophy of Jean Jacques Rousseau547 Words   |  2 PagesRousseau and Golding, Two different men, from two different time periods, with two very different beliefs. Golding believed that everyone was born evil, and to keep people civilized, we need government and laws. Golding shows his beliefs through his book, The lord of the flies. Rousseau, on the other hand, believed that people were born good, and the only thing that corrupted children, was our societies social standards. Rousseau was a Swiss philosopher in the 18th century. He was also a writerRead MorePhilosophy of Rouseau and Lord of the Flies by William Golding666 Words   |  3 Pagesphilosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau believed that people are inherently good. Without civilizations, humans are good beings with empathy, kindness, and well-developed morals. However, he believed that societies corrupt our morals and are what make the change in us to become â€Å"evil† or â€Å"bad†. The author of the novel Lord of the Flies, William Golding, however, believed that in a primitive environment, humans are evil. Without a society watching over us, humans will become barbaric brutes. Jean-Jacques RousseauRead MoreLord Of The Flies Character Analysis Essay1414 Words   |  6 Pages Analysis of Societal Constructs Displayed in LORD â€Å"We hold these truths to be sacred and undeniable; that all men are created equal and independent, that from that equal creation they derive rights inherent and inalienable, among which are the preservation of life, and liberty, and the pursuit of happiness†. This famous phrase that derives from the Declaration of Independence brought forth notion that of all of humanity is to be acknowledged as equal and are guaranteed rights of life which are toRead MoreHuman Nature and Philosophy in Lord of the Flies by William Golding583 Words   |  2 Pagestackle the same topic, human nature, and a great argument breaks out. Is man inherently evil, like William Golding believes? Or is man good at heart but inevitably becomes corrupted by the society he lives in, as said by Jean Jacques Rousseau? Both philosophers have very strong opinions and well reasoning for what they believe. Golding’s views are displayed well throughout his novel, Lord of the Flies; a tale about strong minded, young boys stranded on an island who must find a way to survive on theirRead MoreThe Nature of Man in The Lord of the Flies by William Golding577 Words   |  2 PagesAmidst bloodshed and suffering it is understandable that William Golding would have great difficulty viewing men as naturally good. He argues in his novel, â€Å"The Lord of the Flies† that men need rules and society to keep peace and that if they were to leave that they would fall into chaos, but his arguments are only proven through characters he has constructed. In this debate as old as time itself, there have been others who would disagree with Golding; others who have more faith in man’s nature and lessRead MoreLord of the Flies by William Golding589 Words   |  2 PagesWilliam Golding, the creator of the book Lord of the Flies describes evil as a trait we are born with and learn to control it, while another man by the name of Jean-Jacques Rousseau thought of the opposite whereas we are bo rn good, but the world and society around us change us to doing evil things, but what is considered evil? The one who decides what is evil and what is not is not just one man or women alone, it is decided as a community, and this description of evil seems to fit Rousseau’s beliefsRead MoreLord of the Flies by William Golding835 Words   |  3 PagesThe Lord of The Flies, an amazing and controversial book written by William Golding does have some interesting views on society. If you look on the surface you see some kids who are doing what kids do and that is to be crazy and have fun. However, if you look deeper youll find the roots of Goldings beliefs on society and humanity as a whole. Its more of a pessimistic view. Theres also the view of Jean Jacques Rousseau, the author of Dissertation on the Origin and Foundation of the Inequality